|
Response
to the War in the United States
Opposition
to the war in the United States developed immediately after the Gulf
of Tonkin Resolution, chiefly among traditional pacifists, such as
the American Friends Service Committee and antinuclear activists.
Early protests were organized around questions about the morality of
U.S. military involvement in Vietnam. Virtually every key event of
the war, including the Tet Offensive and the invasion of Cambodia,
contributed to a steady rise in antiwar sentiment. The revelation of
the My Lai Massacre in 1969 caused a dramatic turn against the war
in national polls.
Students
and professors began to organize "teach-ins" on the war in
early 1965 at the University of Michigan, the University of
Wisconsin, and the University of California at Berkeley. The
teach-ins were large forums for discussion of the war between
students and faculty members. Eventually, virtually no college or
university was without an organized student movement, often
spearheaded by Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). The first
major student-led demonstration against the war was organized by SDS
in April 1965 and stunned observers by mobilizing about 20,000
participants. Another important organization was the Student
Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), which denounced the war
as racist as early as 1965. Students also joined The Resistance, an
organization that urged its student members to refuse to register
for the draft, or if drafted to refuse to serve.
While
law enforcement authorities usually blamed student radicals for the
violence that took place on campuses, often it was police themselves
who initiated bloodshed as they cleared out students occupying
campus buildings during "sit-ins" or street
demonstrations. As antiwar sentiment mounted in intensity from 1965
to 1970 so did violence, culminating in the killings of four
students at Kent State in Ohio and of two at Jackson State College
in Mississippi.
Stokely
Carmichael, Malcolm X, and other black leaders denounced the U.S.
presence in Vietnam as evidence of American imperialism. Martin
Luther King, Jr., had grown increasingly concerned about the racist
nature of the war, toward both the Vietnamese and the
disproportionately large numbers of young blacks who were sent to
fight for the United States in Vietnam. In 1967 King delivered a
major address at New York's Riverside Church in which he condemned
the war, calling the United States "the world's greatest
purveyor of violence."
On
October 15, 1969, citizens across the United States participated in
The Moratorium, the largest one-day demonstration against the war.
Millions of people stayed home from work to mark their opposition to
the war; college and high school students demonstrated on hundreds
of campuses. A Baltimore judge even interrupted court proceedings
for a moment of reflection on the war. In Vietnam, troops wore black
armbands in honor of the home-front protest. Nixon claimed there was
a "great silent majority" who supported the war and he
called on them to back his policies. Polls showed, however, that at
that time half of all Americans felt that the war was "morally
indefensible," while 60 percent admitted that it was a mistake.
In November 1969 students from all over the country headed for
Washington, D.C., for the Mobilization Against the War. Over 40,000
participated in a March Against Death from Arlington National
Cemetery to the White House, each carrying a placard with the name
of a young person killed in Vietnam.
Opposition
existed even among conservatives and business leaders, for primarily
economic reasons. The government was spending more than $2 billion
per month on the war by 1967. Some U.S. corporations, ranging from
beer distributors to manufacturers of jet aircraft, benefited
greatly from this money initially, but the high expense of the war
began to cause serious inflation and rising tax rates. Some
corporate critics warned of future costs to care for the wounded.
Labor unions were also becoming increasingly militant in opposition
to the war, as they were forced to respond to the concerns of their
members that the draft was imposing an unfair burden on
working-class people.
Another
factor that turned public opinion against the war was the
publication of the Pentagon Papers on June 13, 1971, by the New
York Times. Compiled secretly by the U.S. Department of Defense,
the papers were a complete history of the involvement of numerous
government agencies in the Vietnam War. They showed a clear pattern
of deception toward the public. One of the senior analysts compiling
this history, Daniel Ellsberg, secretly photocopied key documents
and gave them to the New York Times. Subsequently, support
for Nixon's war policies plummeted, and polls showed that 60 percent
of the public now considered the war "immoral," while 70
percent demanded an immediate withdrawal from Vietnam.
The
Vietnam War cost the United States $130 billion directly, and at
least that amount in indirect costs, such as veterans' and widows'
benefits and the search for Americans Missing-in-Action (MIAs). The
war also spurred serious inflation, contributing to a substantially
increased cost of living in the United States between 1965 and 1975,
with continued repercussions thereafter. More than 58,000 Americans
lost their lives in Vietnam. Over 300,000 U.S. soldiers were
wounded, half of them very seriously. No accurate accounting has
ever been made of U.S civilians (U.S. government agents, religious
missionaries, Red Cross nurses) killed throughout Indochina.
After
returning from the war, many Vietnam veterans suffered from
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, which is characterized by persistent
emotional problems including anxiety and depression. The Department
of Veterans Affairs estimates that 20,000 Vietnam veterans have
committed suicide in the war's aftermath. Throughout the 1970s and
1980s, unemployment and rates of prison incarceration for Vietnam
veterans, especially those having seen heavy combat, were
significantly higher than in the general population.
Having
felt ignored or disrespected both by the Veterans Administration
(now the Department of Veterans Affairs) and by traditional
organizations such as the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the American
Legion, Vietnam veterans have formed their own self-help groups.
Collectively, they forced the Veterans Administration to establish
storefront counseling centers, staffed by veterans, in every major
city. The national organization, Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA),
has become one of the most important service organizations lobbying
in Washington, D.C.
Also
in the capital, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial was dedicated in 1982
to commemorate the U.S. personnel who died or were declared missing
in action in Vietnam. The memorial, which consists of a V-shaped
black granite wall etched with more than 58,000 names, was at first
a source of controversy because it does not glorify the military but
invites somber reflection. The Asian ancestry of its prizewinning
designer, Maya Lin, was also an issue for some veterans. In 1983 a
bronze cast was added, depicting one white, one black, and one
Hispanic American soldier. This led to additional controversy since
some argued that the sculpture muted the original memorial's solemn
message. In 1993 a statue of three women cradling a wounded soldier
was also added to the site to commemorate the service of the 11,000
military nurses who treated soldiers in Vietnam. Despite all of the
controversies, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial has become a site of
pilgrimage for veterans and civilians alike.
While
the United States has been involved in a number of armed
interventions worldwide since it withdrew from Vietnam in 1973,
defense planners have taken pains to persuade the public that goals
were limited and troops would be committed only for a specified
duration. The war in Vietnam created an ongoing debate about the
right of the United States to intervene in the affairs of other
nations.
Effects and
Recovery in Vietnam
Although
South Vietnam was ostensibly the U.S. ally in the conflict, far more
firepower was unleashed on South Vietnamese civilians than on
northerners. About 10 percent of all bombs and shells went
unexploded and continued to kill and maim throughout the region long
after the war, as did buried land mines. Vietnam developed the
highest rate of birth defects in the world, probably due to the use
of Agent Orange and other chemical defoliants. The defoliants used
during the war also destroyed about 15 percent of South Vietnam's
valuable timber resources and contributed to a serious decline in
rice and fish production, the major sources of food for Vietnam.
There
were 800,000 orphans created in South Vietnam alone. At least 10
million people became homeless refugees in the south. Vietnam's
government punished those Vietnamese who had been allied with the
United States by sending them to "re-education camps" and
depriving their families of employment. These measures combined with
economic hardships throughout Vietnam led to the exodus of about 1.5
million people, most of them to the United States as refugees. The
children of U.S. soldiers and Vietnamese women, often called "AmerAsians,"
were looked down upon by the Vietnamese, and many of them immigrated
to the United States.
Nixon
promised $3.25 billion in reconstruction aid to Vietnam, but the aid
was never granted. Neither Gerald Ford, who became president after
Nixon's resignation, nor Congress would assume any responsibility
for the devastation of Vietnam. Instead, in 1975 Ford extended the
embargo already in effect against North Vietnam to all of newly
unified Vietnam. In the Foreign Assistance Appropriation Act of
1976, Congress forbade any assistance for Vietnam or Cambodia.
President
Jimmy Carter attempted to resume relations with Vietnam in 1977,
declaring that "the destruction was mutual." Talks broke
down, however, over the issue of American MIAs and over the promised
reparations, especially after the Vietnamese released a copy of
Nixon's secret letter of 1973, which promised aid "without any
preconditions." Fearing that reparations would amount to an
admission of wrongdoing, Congress added amendments to trade bills
that also cut Vietnam off from international lending agencies like
the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World
Bank) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Normalization was
suspended, deepening the economic crisis facing Vietnam in the
aftermath of the war's destruction. The crisis was worsened by new
wars with China and Cambodia in 1978 and 1979.
Cut
off from all other sources of aid, the SRV turned to the Soviet
Union for loans and technical advisers. The SRV reasoned that, faced
with widespread hunger and enormous health problems, restoring
agricultural production was paramount. The government therefore
seized private property, collectivized plantations, and nationalized
businesses. About 1 million civilians were forcibly moved from
cities to new economic zones. Mismanagement and corruption became
common, and popular disillusion with the regime grew. At the Sixth
Party Congress in 1986, the SRV leadership declared Communism a
failed experiment and vowed radical change. Calling the reforms doi
moi (economic renovation), the SRV opened Vietnam to capitalism.
After the collapse of the USSR in 1991, the SRV leadership was
forced to move further in this direction.
Stepping
up efforts to find American MIAs and cooperating with World Bank and
IMF guidelines for economic reform, Vietnam worked to improve
relations with the United States. In February 1994 President Bill
Clinton lifted the trade embargo, and on July 11, 1995, the United
States formally restored full diplomatic relations with Vietnam.
¡@
¡@ |